Home / Tools / Coding / Cursor
Updated: Dec 28, 2025
Tested: 3 months continuous use
8 min read
Cursor logo

Cursor Review

// Coding Updated: Dec 2025
Best Free Option

After 6 months of building production applications with Cursor, this AI code editor has fundamentally changed how I write software. With the proprietary Composer Agent model completing multi-file tasks in under 30 seconds—4x faster than GPT-5—plus the ability to run 8 agents in parallel and Tab completions with 28% higher acceptance rates, Cursor is the most powerful AI coding assistant available in December 2025.

Quick Intel

Our Rating
4.7
Price $20/mo
Time Saved ~5h/wk
Free Tier Yes
Best For Multi-file code generation and refactoring
Try Cursor

Free tier available. No credit card required.

// Jump To
// TL;DR
If you're serious about AI-assisted development, Cursor is worth every penny. The Pro tier ($20/month) pays for itself if you code more than 5 hours weekly. The Ultra tier ($200/month) is for heavy users who max out API credits. The free Hobby tier gives you a genuine one-week Pro trial to test the full power.
01

Pricing Breakdown

Cursor's December 2025 pricing spans five tiers. The Hobby plan includes a real one-week Pro trial (not a demo), Pro unlocks unlimited completions and agent usage, and Ultra provides 20x the API credits for power users who run multi-agent workflows all day.

Hobby
Free
  • One-week Pro trial
  • Limited Agent requests
  • Limited Tab completions
Pro
$20 /month
  • $20 of API agent usage per month
  • Unlimited Tab completions (powered by Fusion model)
  • Unlimited Auto model selection
  • Background Agents
  • Maximum context windows
Pro+
$60 /month
  • $70 of API agent usage (3x Pro usage)
  • Access to GPT-5, Claude 4 Opus/Sonnet, Gemini 2.5 Pro
  • All Pro features

Cursor Coding ROI Calculator

// Calculate Your Time Savings
// Your Coding Profile
Your hourly rate $75
Coding hours per week 40h
Monthly subscription $20
Calculation Assumptions:
- Cursor reduces coding time by ~25% (20-25% reported by users)
- Based on 22 working days per month
- Includes time saved on debugging, refactoring, and multi-file edits
- Opsera case study: 20-25% time savings, 30-50% cycle reduction for complex projects, 20% more PRs merged
// Your Savings
Annual ROI
0%
Monthly Savings
$0
Annual Savings
$0
Cost/Use
$0.00
Efficiency Gain
0%
Time reclaimed 0h / month
Try Cursor Free
One-week Pro trial included. No credit card required.
02

Feature Analysis

I've pushed Cursor to its limits on full-stack projects, refactoring legacy code, and parallel agent workflows. Here's where it genuinely excels—and where it still falls short.

Composer Agent Model

Excellent

Cursor's proprietary coding model completes multi-file tasks in under 30 seconds—4x faster than GPT-5 or Claude for similar complexity. This speed advantage is unmatched for refactoring and feature development.

Multi-Agent Parallel Execution

Excellent

Run up to 8 agents in parallel from a single prompt. Each works in isolated git worktrees to prevent merge conflicts. This is the killer feature for complex projects—I regularly run 3-4 agents simultaneously.

Tab Completion (Fusion Model)

Excellent

Powered by Supermaven technology with 28% higher acceptance rates and 21% fewer distracting suggestions. Predicts your next edit and jumps your cursor there. Feels almost telepathic after a few weeks.

Deep Codebase Context

Good

Maximum context windows with automatic conversation summarization. Understands project-wide patterns to avoid hallucinating filenames or suggesting non-existent functions. Works best on codebases under 100K lines.

Multi-Model Support

Good

Switch between GPT-5, Claude 4 Opus/Sonnet, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and xAI Grok. Auto mode selects the best model for each task. Frontier model access on Pro+ and Ultra tiers delivers cutting-edge reasoning.

VS Code Compatibility

Good

Built as a VS Code fork—all your extensions, keybindings, and muscle memory transfer instantly. Zero learning curve for VS Code users. This alone removes the biggest barrier to switching editors.

03

The Honest Truth

Based on 180+ days of building full-stack apps, refactoring legacy code, and running multi-agent workflows across 15+ production projects.

What We Love
  • Composer Is 4x Faster Than GPT-5 - For multi-file tasks like refactoring or adding features across components, Composer completes in under 30 seconds. GPT-5 and Claude take 2+ minutes for similar work. This speed compounds over hundreds of tasks.
  • 8 Parallel Agents Change The Game - Ask for a full-stack feature—Cursor spawns agents for frontend, backend, database, tests, and docs simultaneously. Each works in isolated git worktrees. This is genuinely next-level for complex projects.
  • Tab Completion That Actually Helps - 28% higher acceptance vs previous models means less noise. The cursor jump feature predicts where you'll edit next—it's uncanny how often it's right. After using Cursor, GitHub Copilot feels sluggish.
  • Zero Switching Cost From VS Code - All extensions work. All keybindings transfer. Your .vscode settings just work. I migrated in 10 minutes and never looked back. This is the lowest-friction editor switch I've ever experienced.
  • Fortune 500 Trust & Adoption - Over 50% of Fortune 500 companies use Cursor. The $9B valuation and $500M ARR signal serious staying power. You're not betting on a startup that might pivot—this is production-grade infrastructure.
What Could Be Better
  • Ultra Tier Is Expensive For Individuals - $200/month is a serious investment. Unless you're maxing out Pro's $20 API credit daily, stick with Pro. The 10x price jump delivers 20x API usage but no exclusive features beyond that.
  • High Memory Consumption - Cursor uses 1-2GB more RAM than standard VS Code. On 8GB systems, expect slowdowns. Multi-agent mode can spike to 4GB+. Budget 16GB minimum for smooth operation—32GB for heavy multi-agent use.
  • Buggy After Updates - New releases occasionally break Tab completions or agent responses. The team fixes quickly, but if you need absolute stability, wait 2-3 days after major updates before upgrading. I've hit 2-3 bad releases this year.
  • Credit Pool Depletion With Heavy Usage - Pro's $20 API credit lasts 40-60 Composer requests. Heavy users burn through this in 2-3 days. You can add more credits, but costs add up. Track usage or budget for Pro+ ($60/mo with $70 credit).
04

Who Should Use This

Cursor isn't for everyone. Here's who will see the biggest productivity gains—and who should look elsewhere.

Full-Stack Developers

Multi-file editing across frontend, backend, and database is unmatched. Parallel agents handle complex features end-to-end. Pro tier's unlimited Tab completions and agent usage are essential for full-time dev work.

Best Fit

Engineering Teams

Teams tier ($40/mo per user) provides centralized billing, usage analytics, SSO, and privacy controls. Over 50% of Fortune 500 companies use Cursor. Enterprise tier adds audit logs and granular admin controls.

Best Fit

Rapid Prototypers & Startup Builders

Composer's 4x speed advantage and parallel agents cut development cycles by 30-50%. Perfect for MVPs and fast iteration. The 20% increase in PR throughput means you ship features faster while maintaining quality.

Best Fit

Learning Developers

Deep codebase context helps you understand unfamiliar code. Tab completions teach patterns as you code. Free Hobby tier includes a one-week Pro trial—plenty of time to learn the basics. Consider Pro when you code daily.

Good Fit

Legacy Code Refactorers

Multi-file refactoring shines on legacy projects. Understands project-wide dependencies to avoid breaking changes. However, works best on codebases under 100K lines—larger projects may hit context limits.

Good Fit

Budget-Conscious Solo Developers

Ultra at $200/month is hard to justify for individuals. Pro at $20/month is the sweet spot. If you only code a few hours weekly, the free Hobby tier's limited agent requests may suffice—try that first.

Not Ideal
05

vs. Competition

How does Cursor stack up against other AI code editors in December 2025? I've used all of these in production.

ToolPriceKey FeatureNoteBest For
Cursor Pro
Cursor Pro
$20/mo Composer (4x faster) 8 parallel agents Multi-file editing
GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot
$10/mo Inline completions VS Code native Basic code completion
Windsurf
Windsurf
$15/mo Auto context Flows Context-aware editing

My take: For multi-file editing and agent-based workflows, Cursor wins decisively. The Composer model's 4x speed advantage and parallel agent execution have no equivalent. But GitHub Copilot is cheaper for basic completions, and Windsurf's automatic context awareness beats Cursor's manual tagging. Many teams (mine included) use Cursor for complex work and Copilot for quick edits. Cursor is my primary editor for full-stack projects, while Copilot handles one-off scripts and minor fixes.

06

Frequently Asked Questions

Quick answers to the questions everyone asks about Cursor in December 2025.

For multi-file editing and refactoring, absolutely. Cursor's Composer model and parallel agents handle complex tasks that Copilot can't. But Copilot is cheaper ($10 vs $20/mo) and better for simple inline completions. I use both: Cursor for projects, Copilot for scripts.
If you code 5+ hours weekly, yes. The unlimited Tab completions, $20 API credit for Composer, and multi-model access pay for themselves in time saved. The 20-25% productivity boost means you save 1+ hour per day—worth far more than $20. Casual coders can use the free Hobby tier.
Pro ($20/mo) gives $20 API credit, unlimited Tab completions, and frontier model access. Ultra ($200/mo) provides $400 API credit (20x more)—that's it. Ultra is only worth it if you max out Pro's credit pool daily. Most developers should stick with Pro.
Yes, 100%. Cursor is a VS Code fork—all extensions, themes, and keybindings transfer instantly. Your .vscode settings, launch configs, and tasks.json just work. I migrated 50+ extensions in 10 minutes with zero issues.
Tab completions have 28% higher acceptance rates than previous models with 21% fewer suggestions. Composer completes multi-file tasks with 85-90% accuracy in my testing. You'll still review and fix 10-15% of generated code, but it's better than any alternative.
No. Cursor requires internet for AI features—Composer, Tab completions, and chat all use cloud models. You can edit code offline like standard VS Code, but AI assistance won't work. For offline coding, consider Tabnine with local models.
07

Final Verdict

4.7/5
Our Rating

The AI Code Editor That Changed How I Build Software

Cursor has earned a permanent spot in my development workflow. The Composer model's 4x speed advantage and parallel agent execution have no equivalent in any competing product, and the Tab completions with 28% higher acceptance rates genuinely feel telepathic after a few weeks. Is it perfect? No—the Ultra tier at $200/month is expensive, memory consumption is high, and updates occasionally introduce bugs. But for developers who value speed and multi-file intelligence, Cursor Pro at $20/month is the best productivity investment you can make. Ultra is worth it only if you max out Pro's API credits daily—most developers won't.

Try Cursor Free

This review contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.

Browse More Coding Tools
Explore Cursor Alternatives
Full Breakdown Cursor Pricing 2025
Compare:
Cursor vs Chatgpt Cursor vs Perplexity Cursor vs Lindy