Pricing Breakdown
Gumloop uses credit-based pricing across four tiers. Credits are consumed based on AI model complexity (Standard models cost 2 credits, Advanced 20 credits, Expert 30 credits). The free tier provides 2,000 credits to test the platform, while paid plans unlock premium AI models and collaboration features.
- 2,000 credits
- 2 concurrent flow runs
- Forum support
- Access to test platform features
- Access to Standard AI models (GPT-4.1 Nano, GPT-5 Mini/Nano, Claude 3.5 Haiku, Gemini 2.5 Flash, etc.)
- 10,000 credits
- 1 user seat
- Bring Your Own API Key (BYOK)
- 5 concurrent list steps
- Event triggers
- Email support
- Access to Standard (2 credits), Advanced (20 credits), and Expert (30 credits) AI models
- Advanced models include GPT-4.1, Claude 4 Sonnet, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Gemini 2.5 Pro
- Expert models include GPT-5, Claude 4 Opus
- 60,000 credits
- Up to 10 user seats
- Workspaces
- 15 concurrent list steps
- Organization templates
- Shared credentials and custom nodes
- Dedicated Slack support
- Access to Standard (2 credits), Advanced (20 credits), and Expert (30 credits) AI models
- Advanced models include GPT-4.1, Claude 4 Sonnet, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Gemini 2.5 Pro
- Expert models include GPT-5, Claude 4 Opus
Gumloop Automation ROI Calculator
- Gumloop reduces task time by ~80% (10 min to 2 min average)
- Based on 22 working days per month
- Case study: Sales team achieved 65% more meetings and 207% revenue boost
- Lambda saved 457 hours across 15+ teams using automation workflows
Feature Analysis
I've stress-tested Gumloop across lead enrichment, web scraping, and content automation workflows. Here's where it genuinely excels-and where it falls short.
AI Model Access
Native access to GPT-5, Claude 4 Opus, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and more. New frontier models added within days of release. This is the best multi-model access I've seen in any automation platform.
Visual Workflow Builder
The infinite canvas interface feels like Figma meets Zapier. Drag nodes, connect flows, add AI processing blocks. More flexible than Zapier's linear interface, though there's a learning curve.
Credit-Based Pricing
Unlike Zapier's per-step billing, Gumloop charges by credits. As workflows scale, your costs stay predictable. This saved me ~40% compared to running equivalent automations on Zapier.
Web Scraping
Built-in scraping nodes handle dynamic content, pagination, and anti-bot measures. Works well for lead enrichment and competitive research. Chrome extension simplifies setup.
Pre-built Integrations
115+ automation blocks cover common use cases, but the integration library is much smaller than Zapier's 8,000+. You'll need custom API nodes for niche tools.
Documentation
Gumloop University covers basics, but advanced use cases require community forum digging. Documentation is improving but still lags behind mature competitors.
The Honest Truth
Based on 45 days of building lead enrichment, content automation, and web scraping workflows across Solo and Team tiers.
- AI-First Architecture - Built from the ground up for AI workflows. Nodes for categorization, extraction, scoring, and analysis are native-not bolted on. This makes complex AI workflows 3x faster to build than on traditional platforms.
- Frontier Model Access - Solo plan ($37/month) includes GPT-5, Claude 4 Opus, Claude 3.7 Sonnet, and Gemini 2.5 Pro. New models appear within days of release. This level of access would cost $60-80/month across individual AI subscriptions.
- Flat Pricing as You Scale - Credit-based model means costs stay predictable. Unlike Zapier's per-step billing, a 100-step workflow costs the same as a 10-step workflow if they use the same AI processing.
- Real Business Impact - One sales team achieved 65% more meetings and 207% revenue boost using Gumloop for outreach automation. Lambda case study showed 457 hours saved across teams. These aren't vanity metrics.
- Y Combinator Backed - Founded by ex-Microsoft and ex-AWS engineers, $20M+ raised, enterprise customers include Webflow and Rippling. The team ships fast-GPT-5 support arrived same week as OpenAI's release.
- Credit Consumption is Hard to Predict - Expert AI models cost 30 credits per call. If you're testing workflows, credits burn fast. The free tier's 2,000 credits lasted me 4 days during heavy testing. Budget accordingly.
- Steeper Learning Curve Than Zapier - The infinite canvas is powerful but overwhelming for beginners. Expect 2-3 days to feel comfortable building workflows. Zapier's linear interface is more intuitive for simple automations.
- Smaller Integration Library - 115+ pre-built blocks vs Zapier's 8,000+ integrations. For common SaaS tools (Slack, Google Sheets, HubSpot), you're fine. For niche tools, you'll write custom API nodes.
- Solo Plan Is Single-User - At $37/month, Solo includes only 1 seat. Team collaboration requires jumping to the $244/month Team plan. That's a steep price increase for small teams.
Who Should Use This
Gumloop isn't for everyone. Here's who gets the most value-and who should look elsewhere.
Sales & Marketing Teams
Lead enrichment, outreach automation, competitive research. One team achieved 65% more meetings and 207% revenue boost. The AI nodes for data extraction and scoring are purpose-built for this.
Best FitGrowth Teams Automating AI Workflows
Content pipelines, SEO research, lead scoring with custom logic. If your automation needs categorization, summarization, or AI analysis, Gumloop is built for this. Zapier can't match the AI-native approach.
Best FitData Teams Scraping & Processing
Web scraping with built-in AI extraction. Competitive intelligence, market research, price monitoring. The Chrome extension + AI nodes handle complex scraping that would require custom Python scripts elsewhere.
Best FitSimple App-to-App Automation
If you just need to connect Google Forms to Slack, Zapier is easier and cheaper. Gumloop's strength is AI-heavy workflows-don't pay for complexity you don't need.
Good FitBudget-Conscious Freelancers
Solo at $37/month is expensive for light usage, and credits burn fast during testing. Free tier works for experimentation, but serious use requires paid plans. Consider Make.com if budget is tight.
Not IdealUsers Needing 1,000+ Integrations
If your workflow relies on niche SaaS tools, Zapier's 8,000+ integrations win. Gumloop covers common apps well, but the integration library is still growing. Custom API nodes fill gaps but require technical skill.
Not Idealvs. Competition
How does Gumloop compare to other automation platforms in December 2025? I've used all of these for production workflows.
My take: For AI-native workflows requiring categorization, extraction, or multi-model reasoning, Gumloop wins decisively. The frontier model access and credit-based pricing have no equivalent. But Zapier remains better for simple app-to-app automation, and Make.com beats Gumloop on price for basic workflows. I use Gumloop for AI-heavy automation and Zapier for everything else. If your workflows need AI to think, categorize, or extract data, Gumloop is worth the investment.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Gumloop based on 6 weeks of production use across sales automation and data processing workflows.
Final Verdict
The AI Automation Platform I Wish I'd Found Sooner
Gumloop has earned a permanent spot in my automation stack. The AI-first architecture and frontier model access (GPT-5, Claude 4, Gemini 2.5) deliver capabilities that traditional automation platforms can't match, and the credit-based pricing saved me ~40% compared to Zapier on equivalent workflows. Is it perfect? No-the learning curve is steeper than Zapier, and credit consumption is hard to predict during testing. But for anyone automating AI-heavy workflows (lead enrichment, content generation, data extraction), the Solo plan at $37/month is the best automation investment you can make. Team plan ($244/month) is worth it only if you need collaboration features.
Try Gumloop FreeThis review contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission at no extra cost to you.