Updated: Dec 28, 2025
Comparison: Head-to-head analysis
5 min read
Comparison

Cursor vs Flux

Complete comparison guide to help you choose the right coding tool for your needs.

4.4
310 reviews
Free tier available
VS
4.4
6 reviews
Free tier available
01

The Winner

Our Pick

Cursor

Wins for overall value, user satisfaction, and Multi-file code generation and refactoring.

4.4 Rating
Yes Free Tier
Free Starting Price
500K+ Users
02

Quick Comparison

Criteria Cursor Flux
Starting Price Free tier Free tier Best
User Rating 4.4 4.4
Review Count 310 Best 6
Free Trial No No
Annual Discount N/A N/A
Best For Multi-file code generation and refactoring IoT/wearables PCB design teams
03

Feature Breakdown

Feature Comparison

Capability Cursor Flux
AI Scheduling Automated calendar and task scheduling
Team Collaboration Multi-user and team features
Task Management Task tracking and prioritization

Cursor

Strengths
  • Composer Is 4x Faster Than GPT-5
  • 8 Parallel Agents Change The Game
  • Tab Completion That Actually Helps
  • Zero Switching Cost From VS Code
Limitations
  • Ultra Tier Is Expensive For Individuals
  • High Memory Consumption
  • Buggy After Updates
Full Cursor Review →

Flux

Strengths
  • First AI-Native PCB Design Tool
  • Browser-Based Collaboration
  • 97% Cheaper Than Altium
  • Live Component Data
Limitations
  • 8-Layer Maximum
  • Requires Internet
  • Limited Review Coverage
Full Flux Review →
04

Cursor Overview

If you're serious about AI-assisted development, Cursor is worth every penny. The Pro tier ($20/month) pays for itself if you code more than 5 hours weekly. The Ultra tier ($200/month) is for heavy users who max out API credits. The free Hobby tier gives you a genuine one-week Pro trial to test the full power.

Best For:

  • Multi-file code generation and refactoring
  • Complex full-stack application development
  • Teams wanting cutting-edge AI capabilities
  • Developers familiar with VS Code interface
  • Projects requiring deep codebase understanding
  • Rapid prototyping and fast iteration
  • Parallel agent workflows for complex tasks
Read Full Cursor Review
05

Flux Overview

Flux is a browser-based PCB design platform with AI Copilot assistance that automates hardware engineering workflows. Design multi-layer circuit boards for IoT, wearables, and robotics with real-time collaboration, automated routing, and live component data-no desktop software installation required.

Best For:

  • IoT/wearables PCB design teams
  • Teams needing real-time collaboration on PCB projects
  • Engineers transitioning from traditional desktop tools to cloud-based workflows
  • Startups and small teams with limited budgets (vs Altium)
  • Beginners learning PCB design with AI assistance
  • Projects requiring quick iterations and AI-powered optimization
Read Full Flux Review
06

Our Verdict

4.4/5
Winner Rating

Cursor is our top pick for most users, thanks to its overall value proposition. However, Flux remains a solid choice if you need IoT/wearables PCB design teams.

Try Cursor Free
07

Cursor vs Flux FAQ

Both Cursor and Flux are excellent tools. Cursor is better for Multi-file code generation and refactoring, while Flux excels at IoT/wearables PCB design teams. Your choice depends on your specific needs and budget.
Cursor pricing: Free tier available. Flux pricing: Free tier available. Pricing varies, but compare features at each tier to find the best value for your needs.
Yes, many teams use multiple tools for different purposes. Cursor might handle Multi-file code generation and refactoring, while Flux covers IoT/wearables PCB design teams. Check integration options for both tools.
Both offer robust support. Cursor provides standard support, while Flux offers comprehensive support. Enterprise plans typically include dedicated support for both.
Consider switching if Flux better fits your current needs. Key factors: IoT/wearables PCB design teams, pricing alignment, and team workflow compatibility. We recommend trialing Flux before making a full switch.