Updated: Dec 4, 2025
Comparison: Head-to-head analysis
5 min read
Comparison

Bolt.new vs Cursor

Complete comparison guide to help you choose the right coding tool for your needs.

Bolt.new
4.0
33 reviews
Free tier available
Full Review Try Free
VS
Cursor
4.4
310 reviews
Free tier available
Full Review Try Free
01

The Winner

Our Pick

Cursor

Wins for overall value, user satisfaction, and Multi-file code generation and refactoring.

4.4 Rating
Yes Free Tier
Free Starting Price
500K+ Users
Read Full Review Try Cursor Still consider Bolt.new
02

Quick Comparison

Criteria Bolt.new Cursor
Starting Price Free tier Free tier
User Rating 4.0 4.4 Best
Review Count 33 310 Best
Free Trial No No
Annual Discount N/A N/A
Best For Rapid MVP and prototype development Multi-file code generation and refactoring
03

Feature Breakdown

Feature Comparison

Capability Bolt.new Cursor
AI Scheduling Automated calendar and task scheduling
✓ ✓
Task Management Task tracking and prioritization
✓ ✓
AI Assistant/Chat AI-powered conversational features
✓ —

Bolt.new

Strengths
  • Fastest Prototyping Available
  • Zero Setup Required
  • Claude 3.7 Sonnet Integration
  • Native Mobile Development
Limitations
  • Context Loss After 15-20 Iterations
  • Aggressive Token Consumption
  • Not for Production-Grade Apps
Full Bolt.new Review →

Cursor

Strengths
  • Composer Is 4x Faster Than GPT-5
  • 8 Parallel Agents Change The Game
  • Tab Completion That Actually Helps
  • Zero Switching Cost From VS Code
Limitations
  • Ultra Tier Is Expensive For Individuals
  • High Memory Consumption
  • Buggy After Updates
Full Cursor Review →
04

Bolt.new Overview

Bolt.new generates full-stack apps from natural language using Claude 3.7 Sonnet. Free tier: 150K tokens/day. Pro: $20/month for 10M tokens. Best for rapid prototyping, MVPs, and learning web development. Over 1 million websites deployed. Supports React, Vue, Next.js, mobile apps via Expo, plus Figma, GitHub, Stripe, and Supabase integrations.

Best For:

  • Rapid MVP and prototype development
  • Developers wanting instant deployment without DevOps setup
  • Beginners learning full-stack web development
  • Quick validation of app ideas
  • Browser-based development without local environment
  • Projects requiring fast iteration cycles
Read Full Bolt.new Review
05

Cursor Overview

If you're serious about AI-assisted development, Cursor is worth every penny. The Pro tier ($20/month) pays for itself if you code more than 5 hours weekly. The Ultra tier ($200/month) is for heavy users who max out API credits. The free Hobby tier gives you a genuine one-week Pro trial to test the full power.

Best For:

  • Multi-file code generation and refactoring
  • Complex full-stack application development
  • Teams wanting cutting-edge AI capabilities
  • Developers familiar with VS Code interface
  • Projects requiring deep codebase understanding
  • Rapid prototyping and fast iteration
  • Parallel agent workflows for complex tasks
Read Full Cursor Review
06

Our Verdict

4.4/5
Winner Rating

Cursor is our top pick for most users, thanks to its higher user ratings. However, Bolt.new remains a solid choice if you need Rapid MVP and prototype development.

Try Cursor Free
07

Bolt.new vs Cursor FAQ

Both Bolt.new and Cursor are excellent tools. Bolt.new is better for Rapid MVP and prototype development, while Cursor excels at Multi-file code generation and refactoring. Your choice depends on your specific needs and budget.
Bolt.new pricing: Free tier available. Cursor pricing: Free tier available. Pricing varies, but compare features at each tier to find the best value for your needs.
Yes, many teams use multiple tools for different purposes. Bolt.new might handle Rapid MVP and prototype development, while Cursor covers Multi-file code generation and refactoring. Check integration options for both tools.
Both offer robust support. Bolt.new provides standard support, while Cursor offers comprehensive support. Enterprise plans typically include dedicated support for both.
Consider switching if Cursor better fits your current needs. Key factors: Multi-file code generation and refactoring, pricing alignment, and team workflow compatibility. We recommend trialing Cursor before making a full switch.
08

Related Comparisons

Bolt.new Alternatives Cursor Alternatives Bolt.new Pricing Cursor Pricing