Home / Blog / Tutorials / Make AI Agents Guide: Build Adaptive Aut...
Tutorials

Make AI Agents Guide: Build Adaptive Automations in 2025

Published Dec 12, 2025
Read Time 11 min read
Author AI Productivity
#make#ai-agents#automation#workflow#tutorial
i

This post contains affiliate links. I may earn a commission if you purchase through these links, at no extra cost to you.

When Make launched AI Agents in April 2025, I was skeptical. Another “AI-powered” feature slapped onto an existing product? But after building 15+ production scenarios with Make AI Agents over the past 8 months, I’ve changed my tune. These aren’t just GPT wrappers — they’re autonomous decision-making units that adapt workflows in real-time based on data patterns and business rules.

This Make AI agents guide walks you through building your first agent, covers practical use cases I’ve tested in production, and shares the error handling patterns that took me weeks to figure out.

What Are Make AI Agents?

When exploring make ai agents guide, consider the following.

Make AI Agents (still in beta as of December 2025) are autonomous modules within your Make scenarios that can:

  • Analyze incoming data and make decisions without predefined rules
  • Adapt workflow paths based on context, not just static conditions
  • Learn from patterns in your data to improve decisions over time
  • Call external AI models (GPT-4o, Claude, custom providers) for reasoning

Unlike traditional automation with rigid if-then logic, AI Agents introduce flexibility. A customer support agent can categorize tickets by urgency and sentiment, route them appropriately, and even draft initial responses — all without you coding every possible scenario.

Make automation platform dashboard

Prerequisites: What You Need to Get Started

Before diving in, make sure you have:

  • Make Pro tier or higher ($18.82/month) — AI Agents require Pro access
  • Connected AI provider — OpenAI API key or Claude API key configured in Make
  • Basic Make familiarity — You should understand modules, routes, and data mapping
  • A clear use case — AI Agents shine with classification, routing, and content generation tasks

If you’re new to Make, start with their Academy tutorials first. The visual interface has a learning curve (4-8 hours for most users), and you’ll want that foundation before adding AI complexity.

Step 1: Configure Your AI Provider

First, connect your AI model to Make:

  1. Go to Connections in your Make organization
  2. Click Add Connection → Search for “OpenAI” or “Anthropic”
  3. Enter your API key (find these in your OpenAI/Anthropic dashboard)
  4. Test the connection to verify it works

Pro tip: Make supports custom AI providers on all paid plans (updated November 2025). If you’re using Azure OpenAI, Google Vertex AI, or self-hosted models, you can connect those too via the HTTP module with proper authentication.

For most AI Agent use cases, I recommend:

Task TypeModelTemperatureMax Tokens
ClassificationGPT-4o-mini0.1256
Content GenerationGPT-4o0.72048
Data ExtractionClaude 3.5 Sonnet0.21024
Reasoning TasksGPT-4o or o30.34096

Lower temperature (0.1-0.3) for deterministic tasks like classification. Higher temperature (0.5-0.8) for creative tasks like content generation.

Step 2: Build Your First AI Agent Scenario

Let’s build a practical example: an email triage agent that classifies incoming emails by urgency and department, then routes them appropriately.

The Scenario Structure

[Email Trigger] → [AI Classification Module] → [Router] → [Department-Specific Actions]

Creating the Scenario

  1. Add Email Trigger:

    • Add the Gmail or Outlook module as your trigger
    • Set it to watch for new emails in your inbox

  2. Add AI Module:

    • Search for “OpenAI” in modules and add “Create a Chat Completion”
    • Connect to your AI provider
    • Configure the system prompt:
You are an email classification agent. Analyze the incoming email and respond with a JSON object containing:
- urgency: "critical", "high", "medium", or "low"
- department: "sales", "support", "billing", "general"
- summary: A one-sentence summary of the email
- suggested_action: What should happen next

Consider urgency critical if: mentions legal action, service outage, security breach, or explicit deadline within 24 hours.
Consider urgency high if: mentions money, unhappy customer, or time-sensitive request.

  1. Add the User Message:

    • Map the email subject and body from the trigger:
    Subject: {{1.subject}}
Body: {{1.body}}
From: {{1.from.address}}

  2. Parse the Response:

    • Add a “Parse JSON” module to convert the AI response to structured data
    • Connect it to the AI module output

  3. Add Router:

    • Add a Router module after Parse JSON
    • Create branches for each department:
      • Route 1: department equals "sales" → Salesforce module
      • Route 2: department equals "support" → Zendesk module
      • Route 3: department equals "billing" → Stripe lookup module
      • Fallback: else → Slack notification for manual review

  4. Add Urgency Handling:

    • On each route, add a secondary filter for urgency
    • Critical urgency: Trigger Slack alert + SMS to on-call
    • High urgency: Priority flag in destination system
    • Medium/Low: Standard processing

Step 3: Error Handling Patterns

This is where most Make AI Agent implementations fail. AI responses aren’t always perfect, and your scenarios need to handle failures gracefully.

Pattern 1: Validation Layer

Always validate AI output before acting on it:

[AI Module] → [Parse JSON] → [Set Variable: isValid] → [Router by isValid]

In the Set Variable module, check that required fields exist:

{{if(1.department; if(1.urgency; if(1.summary; true; false); false); false)}}

Route invalid responses to a fallback path — usually a Slack notification for manual review.

Pattern 2: Retry with Context

If the AI returns invalid JSON or nonsensical classification:

  1. Add an error handler after the Parse JSON module
  2. In the error handler, retry the AI call with additional context:
Previous attempt failed to parse. Please respond ONLY with valid JSON. No explanations.
Subject: {{1.subject}}
Body: {{1.body}}
  1. Limit retries to 2 attempts to avoid infinite loops

Pattern 3: Confidence Scoring

Ask the AI to include a confidence score, then route low-confidence items differently:

Respond with JSON including a "confidence" field (0.0 to 1.0) indicating how certain you are about the classification.

Route items with confidence < 0.7 to human review instead of automated processing.

Pattern 4: Fallback Defaults

For critical workflows, always have a sensible default:

// In a Set Variable module:
Department: {{ifempty(1.department; "general")}}
Urgency: {{ifempty(1.urgency; "medium")}}

This ensures your workflow continues even with incomplete AI responses.

Step 4: Advanced Use Cases

Once you’ve mastered the basics, here are production patterns I’ve implemented:

Use Case 1: Dynamic Lead Scoring

Instead of static lead scoring rules, let the AI evaluate prospects:

Analyze this lead and score them 1-100 based on:
- Company size and industry fit
- Engagement signals (pages visited, emails opened)
- Budget indicators in their communication
- Timeline urgency

Lead data:
{{leadData}}

Route high-score leads (80+) to immediate sales outreach. Medium scores (50-79) to nurture sequences. Low scores to marketing automation.

Use Case 2: Content Moderation

For user-generated content platforms:

Review this user submission for:
- Spam indicators
- Inappropriate content
- Quality score (1-5)
- Category classification

Return: {"action": "approve|reject|review", "reason": "...", "category": "..."}

Approve high-quality content automatically. Reject obvious spam. Flag edge cases for human moderators.

Use Case 3: Intelligent Document Processing

Use Make’s AI Content Extractor with AI Agents:

  1. Trigger: New file in Google Drive
  2. AI Content Extractor: Extract text from PDF/image
  3. AI Agent: Classify document type (invoice, contract, receipt, etc.)
  4. Router: Route to appropriate processing:
    • Invoices → Extract amounts, vendor, due date → QuickBooks
    • Contracts → Extract parties, dates, terms → DocuSign/CRM
    • Receipts → Extract merchant, amount, category → Expense tracking

Step 5: Monitoring and Optimization

AI Agents need monitoring more than traditional automations:

Track Key Metrics

Create a logging scenario that runs after each AI Agent execution:

  • Decision accuracy: Periodically review AI classifications manually
  • Error rate: Track Parse JSON failures, invalid responses
  • Latency: Monitor AI response times (GPT-4o averages 1-3 seconds)
  • Cost: Track API token usage per scenario

Prompt Iteration

Your initial prompts won’t be perfect. Build a feedback loop:

  1. Log all AI responses to a Google Sheet
  2. Weekly review: Flag incorrect classifications
  3. Update system prompts based on failure patterns
  4. Version your prompts (I keep them in a prompts/ folder with dates)

Cost Optimization

AI API costs can add up quickly. Optimize by:

  • Use smaller models for simple tasks: GPT-4o-mini costs 90% less than GPT-4o and works fine for classification
  • Reduce max tokens: Most classification tasks need < 500 tokens
  • Cache common responses: If you’re classifying the same email signatures repeatedly, cache those results
  • Batch processing: Aggregate multiple items and process in one AI call where possible

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

After 8 months of production use, here are the mistakes I see most:

Pitfall 1: Over-relying on AI

Not every decision needs an AI Agent. Simple, deterministic logic (if email contains “unsubscribe” → route to unsubscribe handler) should stay as traditional filters. Use AI for genuinely ambiguous decisions.

Pitfall 2: Vague Prompts

“Classify this email” is too vague. Provide:

  • Explicit categories with definitions
  • Examples of each category
  • Edge case handling instructions
  • Output format requirements

Pitfall 3: No Human Escalation

Always include a path for human review. AI Agents are beta, and even production AI makes mistakes. Build in a “human in the loop” for:

  • High-stakes decisions
  • Low-confidence classifications
  • Novel situations the AI hasn’t seen

Pitfall 4: Ignoring Latency

AI calls add 1-5 seconds per request. For time-sensitive workflows (like chat responses), consider:

  • Streaming responses where possible
  • Async processing with callbacks
  • Caching frequently-needed decisions

Maia AI: Natural Language Scenario Building

Make also offers Maia AI, a separate feature that builds scenarios from natural language descriptions. It’s different from AI Agents:

  • Maia AI: Creates the scenario structure (“When I get a Stripe payment, add to Google Sheets and send a Slack message”)
  • AI Agents: Make decisions within existing scenarios (classify, route, generate content)

Maia works surprisingly well for standard patterns. It saved me 60% setup time on simple scenarios. But for complex workflows with multiple branches, you’ll still need to build manually and add AI Agent modules yourself.

Is It Worth the Pro Tier?

At $18.82/month (or $16/month annual), Make Pro unlocks:

  • AI Agents access
  • 8 million operations/month
  • Priority execution
  • Full-text log search
  • Advanced error handling

For any business running automation at scale, Pro tier pays for itself in one month through:

  • Reduced manual processing time
  • Faster error diagnosis (full-text log search)
  • Higher-value automated decisions (AI Agents)

If you’re currently on Core and curious about AI Agents, the upgrade is worth testing. You can downgrade if it doesn’t fit your workflow.

What’s Next for Make AI Agents

Based on Make’s roadmap discussions and beta releases:

  • Multi-agent orchestration: Multiple AI Agents collaborating within scenarios (similar to n8n’s Agent-to-Agent)
  • Memory persistence: Agents remembering context across executions
  • Fine-tuned models: Upload your own training data for domain-specific agents
  • Reduced latency: Faster AI response times through model optimization

The April 2025 beta has matured significantly, but I expect major improvements in early 2026. If you’re hesitant about beta software, wait for the general release — but if you want a competitive edge in automation, start experimenting now.

Getting Started Today

Here’s your 30-minute quick start:

  1. Upgrade to Pro if you’re on Core/Free (required for AI Agents)
  2. Connect OpenAI in your Make connections
  3. Clone a template: Search “AI” in Make’s template gallery for starter scenarios
  4. Build a simple classifier: Email triage, lead scoring, or content categorization
  5. Test with real data: Run 20-30 real items through your scenario
  6. Iterate on prompts: Refine based on classification accuracy

Make AI Agents aren’t magic — they’re powerful tools that require thoughtful implementation. But once you’ve built your first production scenario that adapts to your business context without manual intervention, you’ll understand why this is the future of automation.

The workflow automation landscape in 2025 is splitting into two camps: rigid rules-based automation and adaptive AI-augmented automation. Make AI Agents put you firmly in the second camp — without requiring you to become an AI engineer.

Start small, iterate quickly, and build confidence. The learning curve is real, but the payoff — truly adaptive automations that evolve with your business — is worth the investment.

Summary: This Make AI agents guide covered essential considerations for building adaptive automations.

For more productivity insights, explore our guides on Best Workflow Automation Tools 2025, Best Ai Automation Tools 2025. For alternative automation platforms, compare Zapier for code-free integrations or Lindy for AI-native agent workflows.

External Resources

For official Make documentation and updates:

  • Make Blog — AI Agents updates, automation strategies, and workflow templates
  • Make Academy — Official tutorials and certification courses for scenario building