Updated: Jan 16, 2026
Comparison: Head-to-head analysis
5 min read
Comparison

Greenhouse vs Workable

Complete comparison guide to help you choose the right productivity tool for your needs.

4.4
5,366 reviews
From $?/mo
VS
4.2
1,391 reviews
Free tier available
01

The Winner

Our Pick

Greenhouse

Wins for overall value, user satisfaction, and High-volume enterprise recruiting teams.

4.4 Rating
No Free Tier
$? Starting Price
7.5K+ Users
02

Quick Comparison

Criteria Greenhouse Workable
Starting Price Custom pricing Free tier Best
User Rating 4.4 Best 4.2
Review Count 5,366 Best 1,391
Free Trial No No
Annual Discount N/A N/A
Best For High-volume enterprise recruiting teams Teams scaling fast or hiring internationally
03

Feature Breakdown

Feature Comparison

Capability Greenhouse Workable
AI Scheduling Automated calendar and task scheduling
Calendar Integration Syncs with major calendars
Team Collaboration Multi-user and team features
Task Management Task tracking and prioritization
AI Assistant/Chat AI-powered conversational features
Analytics & Insights Data and productivity insights

Greenhouse

Strengths
  • AI Features Actually Save Time
  • 500+ Integrations Beat Everyone
  • Structured Hiring Framework
  • #1 ATS on G2
Limitations
  • Steep Learning Curve
  • High Routine Task Overhead
  • No Transparent Pricing
Full Greenhouse Review →

Workable

Strengths
  • Intuitive Interface with Minimal Learning Curve
  • AI Sourcing Uncovers Hidden Candidates
  • Transparent Team Collaboration
  • Interview Copilot Saves Post-Interview Time
Limitations
  • Reporting Requires Extra Subscriptions
  • Persistent Integration Bugs
  • Expensive for Feature Set Provided
Full Workable Review →
04

Greenhouse Overview

If you're ready to professionalize your hiring process and have the budget, Greenhouse delivers. The AI features (interview questions, scorecard summaries, talent filtering) save 15+ hours weekly, and the 500+ integrations connect everything. But pricing is custom-only (starting around $6,000-$10,000/year minimum), requires extensive training, and support is slower than competitors. Best for mid-size to enterprise teams with high-volume hiring needs.

Best For:

  • High-volume enterprise recruiting teams
  • Companies requiring 500+ integrations with third-party platforms
  • Organizations needing advanced reporting and analytics (40+ templates)
  • Teams focused on structured hiring and DE&I initiatives
  • Businesses with complex hiring workflows and multiple stakeholders
  • Companies that can invest in training time for comprehensive ATS features
Read Full Greenhouse Review
05

Workable Overview

AI recruiting platform with 400M+ candidate sourcing, Interview Copilot, and posting to 200+ boards. From $169/month; Premier ($599/mo) unlocks full AI suite. Best for scaling teams with international hiring needs.

Best For:

  • Teams scaling fast or hiring internationally
  • Companies needing AI-powered candidate sourcing from 400M+ profiles
  • Organizations posting to 200+ job boards simultaneously
  • Companies requiring multilingual recruitment (6 languages)
  • Businesses seeking integrated ATS and HRIS in one platform
Read Full Workable Review
06

Our Verdict

4.4/5
Winner Rating

Greenhouse is our top pick for most users, thanks to its higher user ratings. However, Workable remains a solid choice if you need Teams scaling fast or hiring internationally.

Try Greenhouse Free
07

Greenhouse vs Workable FAQ

Both Greenhouse and Workable are excellent tools. Greenhouse is better for High-volume enterprise recruiting teams, while Workable excels at Teams scaling fast or hiring internationally. Your choice depends on your specific needs and budget.
Greenhouse pricing: Contact for pricing. Workable pricing: Free tier available. Workable is more affordable at the entry level, but compare features at each tier to find the best value for your needs.
Yes, many teams use multiple tools for different purposes. Greenhouse might handle High-volume enterprise recruiting teams, while Workable covers Teams scaling fast or hiring internationally. Check integration options for both tools.
Both offer robust support. Greenhouse provides standard support, while Workable offers comprehensive support. Enterprise plans typically include dedicated support for both.
Consider switching if Workable better fits your current needs. Key factors: Teams scaling fast or hiring internationally, pricing alignment, and team workflow compatibility. We recommend trialing Workable before making a full switch.